AI Will Further Enrich the ‘Tech Bro’ Class, Nobel Laureate Joe Stiglitz Warns, While It Also Threatens Jobs

(SeaPRwire) –   Tech figures are ubiquitous, often cast as the modern-day antagonists of Hollywood. They secured a potential victory this week following President Donald Trump’s decision to indefinitely delay an Executive Order concerning artificial intelligence. While this “broligarchy” has rapidly accumulated wealth and influence, Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz suggests that the very technology driving their success could propel them into an even higher tier of prosperity.

Stiglitz, a Columbia University professor, has dedicated his career to analyzing the shortcomings of capitalism, including financial instability, the failures of globalization, and the erosion of the American middle class. Now 83, he observes that AI threatens to replicate these patterns.

“If we fail to manage AI, there is a significant risk that it will exacerbate inequality,” Stiglitz noted. “Given that inequality is such a grave issue in our society, this is a major concern for me.”

AI enables corporations to reduce labor costs, concentrate profits at the top, and shift the burdens of economic transition onto workers and the public—a trajectory Stiglitz highlights in his 2024 book, The Road to Freedom: Economics and the Good Society. In an interview, the economist argued that AI serves as a prime example of how technology can accelerate inequality.

The ‘tech bros’ are pulling up the ladder

The individuals spearheading AI adoption are simultaneously advocating for the reduction of government institutions that could mitigate the resulting disruption. This was clearly demonstrated this week when tech billionaires like David Sacks, Elon Musk, and Mark Zuckerberg successfully lobbied President Donald Trump to withhold an AI-related Executive Order. Stiglitz views this as a concerning example of industry influence over governance.

“Unfortunately, the tech figures advocating for this are also pushing for a smaller government, which will hinder the state’s ability to implement the necessary measures for a successful transition,” he stated.

“If these tech oligarchs persist in their push to downscale government, they will impair the state’s capacity to facilitate the AI transition. That is the fundamental challenge we face—they are creating conditions that make a successful transition impossible.”

Stiglitz emphasized that the government “must provide support to help people transition from roles where they are no longer needed to areas where they can be more productive.”

However, government regulation often conflicts with the primary goal of business owners: reducing overhead and increasing profits. Technology strategist Daniel Miessler recently suggested that “the ideal number of human employees inside of any company is zero.” For owners, labor is a cost to be minimized; AI is the first technology that offers a credible path to eliminating it. This is the inequality Stiglitz has warned about for years, yet he notes that those in power are currently not listening.

Even financial leaders are beginning to voice these concerns. BlackRock CEO Larry Fink noted at Davos that AI’s “early gains are flowing to the owners of models, owners of data, and owners of infrastructure.” Meanwhile, the bottom half of the U.S. population, which holds only about 1% of stock market wealth, is excluded from these benefits. Fink questioned what will happen to the workforce if AI impacts white-collar jobs the way globalization affected blue-collar roles, suggesting it could represent a major failure of capitalism.

“During the Great Depression, agricultural productivity increased significantly. We didn’t need as many farmers, but we lacked the mechanisms to transition people out of the rural sector until World War II. It was government intervention during the war that solved that issue. We currently lack the institutional framework to do the same.”

Economists at the Bank of America Institute found that recent productivity gains are primarily boosting corporate profits, while labor’s share of U.S. GDP continues to decline—a trend reminiscent of the 19th-century Industrial Revolution, where factory owners prospered while worker wages remained stagnant for decades. Gallup data indicates that most American workers are wary of AI and fear for their job security, while executives consistently overestimate employee enthusiasm for the technology.

There is another way

In The Road to Freedom, Stiglitz argues that when money dominates politics, policy consistently favors the powerful, and “freedom” becomes a justification for deepening inequality. True freedom, he contends, requires strong institutions capable of checking concentrated private power and ensuring economic gains are shared. A society where AI enriches platform owners while stripping opportunities from the middle class is merely an oligarchy equipped with advanced technology.

Stiglitz is not a pessimist; he utilizes AI himself for research. However, he frames it differently—not as a decision-maker, but as a tool: “I view AI as augmenting my abilities. It’s like having a team of research assistants, but faster.”

Stiglitz refers to this as “IA,” or “intelligence assisting.” He compared it to a microscope or telescope, noting, “They augmented our capabilities by allowing us to see things we couldn’t otherwise perceive.” In his work, AI helps him review literature and find sources, but he maintains, “It is an amazing research tool, but it’s not a substitute for thinking.”

The distinction between IA—a tool serving humanity—and AI depends on who controls the technology, who reaps the rewards, and whether public institutions can ensure fair distribution. In a political system shaped by money, Stiglitz remains skeptical. “Economic inequality can be reinforced into political inequality,” he warned.

More on tech:

• Sales departments continue hiring even as AI reduces jobs elsewhere
• AI productivity is the primary factor preventing the national debt from growing even faster
• Cybersecurity must improve “10 times” over if the U.S. intends to maintain an edge over China and Russia