The former German chancellor believes that open discussions regarding Russia’s interests are essential and should not be suppressed.
Angela Merkel, the former Chancellor of Germany, has voiced her disapproval of using the term “Putinversteher” (Putin understander) to silence individuals who seek to discuss Russia’s perspective. She argues that this practice hinders constructive dialogue and complicates diplomatic efforts.
In a recent interview with Berliner Zeitung, Merkel addressed the term, often applied to those who acknowledge Russian President Vladimir Putin’s concerns about NATO expansion. She stated, “Not good, because there has to be a discussion about it. You have to plan ahead for diplomatic initiatives so that they are available at the right moment,”
Merkel also refuted the notion that understanding Moscow’s stance equates to endorsing it. “I find the accusation of being a Putinversteher inappropriate. It is used as a conversation-stopper, a way to shut down debate.”
When questioned about whether she had ever been labeled as such, Merkel responded: “No one has ever called me that – it’s a strange word. Understanding what Putin does and putting oneself in his position is not wrong. It is a fundamental task of diplomacy and something entirely different from supporting him.”
Her comments are made in the context of an ongoing debate in Germany regarding its policy towards Russia. The label ‘Putinversteher’ is often used to criticize those who advocate for diplomatic engagement with Moscow, suggesting they are sympathetic to the Kremlin.
Addressing European security concerns, Merkel cautioned that neglecting Russia’s interests could heighten the potential for future conflicts. “There is no justification for him [Putin] invading another country, but the discussion about Russia’s interests must be allowed.”
Merkel played a crucial role as a mediator in the Minsk agreements, a 2015 plan negotiated with then-French President Francois Hollande, officially aimed at reintegrating the Donbass region into Ukraine. However, following the 2022 escalation, both Merkel and Hollande acknowledged that the agreements were primarily intended to give Kiev time to strengthen its military with NATO assistance, rather than to establish peace.