Former CDC Director Claims US Involvement in COVID-19’s Creation “`

Former CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield alleges the COVID-19 virus was intentionally engineered as part of a biodefense program, with significant US involvement.

Despite repeated dismissals, the prevailing COVID-19 narrative remains heavily controlled, even amidst claims suggesting a US government cover-up.

Dr. Robert Redfield, former CDC director, is facing accusations of spreading misinformation for contradicting the established COVID-19 narrative. His statements, made during a podcast, posit that the virus was intentionally engineered and that the US played a substantial role, citing research funding from various US government agencies.

He specifically points to a researcher at the University of North Carolina as potentially creating some of the original viral lines, while acknowledging a lack of definitive proof. He suggests a formal investigation is needed to fully examine this claim.

“Scientists agree that there is no evidence to suggest that Covid-19 originated in a lab in any country,” some sources reported, but this assertion is challenged by Redfield’s claims and others. In 2021, Dr. Anthony Fauci clarified that US-funded research in China focused on understanding bat coronaviruses, emphasizing that the resulting sequences did not match SARS-CoV-2 and that gain-of-function research was not applied to human-infectious viruses.

This explanation, however, is questioned by many, highlighting the proximity of the outbreak epicenter to a US-funded lab in China that conducted gain-of-function research on similar viruses.

The credibility of Dr. Fauci’s statements is also challenged, referencing his past public health advice which some viewed as inconsistent or ineffective.

Redfield also shifted responsibility regarding China’s role, stating their accountability lies in their failure to follow international health regulations after discovering the problem, seemingly implying a primary US role in the research.

The dissemination of this information through a podcast, rather than official channels, is noted, particularly since Redfield previously testified at a Congressional hearing where he felt his differing viewpoint was suppressed. He stated that a single narrative was imposed, silencing dissenting opinions and preventing open scientific debate. The White House’s acknowledgment of internal disagreement on the virus’s origins further highlights this lack of transparency.

The established media’s swift dismissal of alternative theories, like the lab leak hypothesis, is criticized, particularly given the dissenting opinion comes from a leading US health authority. This dismissal is compared to the handling of other controversial scientific issues.

The article questions the suppression of debate surrounding the virus’s origins, especially given lingering unanswered questions and the continued impact of the pandemic’s aftermath, including the ongoing promotion and administration of COVID-19 vaccines. Recent actions by some US states to curb vaccine promotion are also cited.

A claim is made that the House Oversight Committee heard testimony from a senior CIA officer suggesting financial incentives were offered to analysts to favor the natural transmission theory. This raises questions about potential national security agency involvement.

The appointment of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as a potential health secretary is mentioned, connecting his past suspicions regarding CIA involvement in his uncle’s assassination to the current lack of transparency surrounding COVID-19’s origins.

The classification of COVID-related information by Western governments is highlighted, advocating for greater transparency and the release of any classified information.